Nomenclature
original description
(of Furcularia reinhardti Ehrenberg, 1834) Ehrenberg, C.G. (1834). Dritter Beitrag zur Erkenntniss grosser Organisation in der Richtung des kleinsten Raumes. <em>Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.</em> 1833: 145-336, pls I-XIII [1-11].
page(s): 208 [details] 
basis of record
O'Reilly, M. (2001). Rotifera, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 149-151 (look up in IMIS) [details]
basis of record
De Smet, W H. (2002). Marine Rotifera from the Crozet and Kerguelen Islands (Subantarctica), with the description of a new Encentrum (Monogononta: Dicranophoridae). <em>International Review of Hydrobiology.</em> 87: 411-422. [details] Available for editors
[request]
Other
additional source
De Smet, W. H. (1996). Rotifera. Volume 4: The Proalidae (Monogononta). In: T. Nogrady. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. Amsterdam. SPB Academic Publishing, 9, 102 [details] Available for editors
[request]
additional source
Segers, H. (2007). Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa, 1564, 1-104, available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2007f/zt01564p104.pdf [details] Available for editors
[request]
additional source
Phillips, L.M., R.I. Leihy & S.L. Chown. (2022). Improving species‐based area protection in Antarctica. <em>Conservation Biology.</em> 36(4): e13885.Aug 2022., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13885 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy not Furcularia reinhardti Ehrenberg after Levander (1894)[=Proales theodora (Gosse)], Sachse (1914)[=P. theodora (Gosse)?]._x000d_
The species is often confused with P. theodora (Gosse). In particular, all records of P. reinhardti from freshwater are doubtful (De Smet, 1996:46). [details]