Pallas, P. S. (1774). Spicilegia zoologica, quibus novae imprimis et obscurae animalium species iconibus, descriptionibus atque commentariis illustrantur cura P.S. Pallas. <em>[Book series, 14 volumes].</em> Fasciculus 10, pp. 1–41, 4 plates., available online athttps://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27823183[details]
Note Nishikawa (1998: 253) stated that the "type...
From editor or global species database
Type species Nishikawa (1998: 253) stated that the "type species is Lumbricus thalassema by monotypy, because it is the only species with which Thalassema was firstly associated (see ICZN Art 67l)". According to Arts. 67.1.2 and 67.12 of the Code (ICZN 1999), however, the type species must be Thalassema neptuni, not Lumbricus thalassema. [details]
Description The original mention of Thalassema by Pallas on page 8 in his Latin text, under the heading "Lumbricus thalassema",...
Description The original mention of Thalassema by Pallas on page 8 in his Latin text, under the heading "Lumbricus thalassema", seemingly as a genus is as follows:
"Hanc speciem, quae praecedentis structuram pulchre illustrat , in Cornubia observauit profunde inter rimas rupium submarinarum habitantem Cel. Jos. Gaertner, cujus propriis verbis descriptionem , communicatamque cum plurimis infra recensendis iconem, hic infero lubens. Thalassema Neptunii nomen huic vermiculo fecit Gaertnerus noster ; Eumque generis ad quod mihi pertinere visus eft denominationi, pro distinguenda specie, adjeci." [details]
Etymology According to Fisher (1946) the etymology is "thalassos (sea) + ema (dart)" . According to Nishikawa (1998) Thalassema is a...
Etymology According to Fisher (1946) the etymology is "thalassos (sea) + ema (dart)" . According to Nishikawa (1998) Thalassema is a neuter noun. It appears to have been treated as a neuter genus by most authors. As thalassema is a noun, it cannot change suffix when first used as a species-group name (Lumbricus thalassema) and then recombined (Thalassema thalassema). Thus 'thalassemum' as if a variable adjective in Stephens & Edmonds (1972) is incorrect. [details]
WoRMS (2025). Thalassema Pallas, 1774. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=110357 on 2025-04-03
original descriptionPallas, P. S. (1774). Spicilegia zoologica, quibus novae imprimis et obscurae animalium species iconibus, descriptionibus atque commentariis illustrantur cura P.S. Pallas. <em>[Book series, 14 volumes].</em> Fasciculus 10, pp. 1–41, 4 plates., available online athttps://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27823183[details]
original description(ofThalassina Montagu, 1813)Montagu, G. (1813). Descriptions of several new or rare animals, principally marine, discovered on the south coast of Devonshire. <em>Transactions of the Linnean Society of London.</em> 11(1): 1–26, pls. 1–5., available online athttp://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/756542 page(s): 24. [details]
basis of recordMaiorova, A. S., Adrianov, A. V. (2019). Biodiversity of echiurans (Echiura) of the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench area. <em>Progress in Oceanography.</em> 180: 102216., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102216 page(s): 12, 13, 15 [details]
basis of recordMaiorova, A. S., Adrianov, A. V. (2020). A review on biogeography of the deep-sea Echiura along the NW Pacific. <em>In: Saeedi, H., Brandt, A. (Eds.) Biogeographic Atlas of the Deep NW Pacific Fauna.</em> Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 213–230., available online athttps://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e51315 page(s): 224, 225 [details]
Taxonomy
taxonomy sourceStephen, A. C., Edmonds, S. J. (1972). The Phyla Sipuncula and Echiura. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London. page(s): 452 [details]
Other
additional sourceHayward, P.J. & J.S. Ryland (Eds.). (1990). The marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. <em>Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.</em> 627 pp. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors [request]
additional sourcevan der Land, J. (2001). Echiura, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 178 (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional sourceMurina, Vantsetti. List of Echiura.[details]
additional sourceSatô, H. (1939). Studies on the Echiuroidea, Sipunculoidea and Priapuloidea of Japan. <em>Science Reports of the Tôhoku Imperial University, Fourth Series, Biology.</em> 14 (4): 339–460, plates XIX–XXIII.[details]
additional sourcePopkov, D. V. (1992). A new echiuran species Thalassema malakhovi (Echiura) from New Zealand. <em>New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research.</em> 26(3-4): 379–383., available online athttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288330.1992.9516531 note: Emendation (re-diagnosis of genus) [details]
additional sourceNishikawa, T. (1998). Nomenclatural remarks on the family-group names of the Phylum Echiura. <em>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington.</em> 111(2): 249–256., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35459003[details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Authority Lamarck (1801: 328) clearly uses 'Thalassema' as a valid genus (for his new name Thalassema rupium for the existing name Lumbricus thalassema deriving from Pallas, and he credits the genus authorship to Cuvier, but Stephen & Edmonds state they could not find evidence of this. Sherborn lists an 1801 mention of Thalassema by Cuvier in the first volume of the "Lecons .." but states the first formal mention is in Lamarck. The possible Cuvier or other authorship perhaps needs further investigation, but "Thalassema" was a pre-Lamarck name (in Pallas 1774 at least). The question is, did Pallas's mention of it (as Thalassema neptuni of Gaertner) make it an available name from that date, when it is a mention in synonymy (of Lumbricus thalassema). Nishikawa (1998:253) analysed the situation, and decided that Thalassema did date from Pallas 1774. However, it is possible the genus should be given a later date of when it appears in Lamarck (1801). [details] Description The original mention of Thalassema by Pallas on page 8 in his Latin text, under the heading "Lumbricus thalassema", seemingly as a genus is as follows:
"Hanc speciem, quae praecedentis structuram pulchre illustrat , in Cornubia observauit profunde inter rimas rupium submarinarum habitantem Cel. Jos. Gaertner, cujus propriis verbis descriptionem , communicatamque cum plurimis infra recensendis iconem, hic infero lubens. Thalassema Neptunii nomen huic vermiculo fecit Gaertnerus noster ; Eumque generis ad quod mihi pertinere visus eft denominationi, pro distinguenda specie, adjeci." [details] Etymology According to Fisher (1946) the etymology is "thalassos (sea) + ema (dart)" . According to Nishikawa (1998) Thalassema is a neuter noun. It appears to have been treated as a neuter genus by most authors. As thalassema is a noun, it cannot change suffix when first used as a species-group name (Lumbricus thalassema) and then recombined (Thalassema thalassema). Thus 'thalassemum' as if a variable adjective in Stephens & Edmonds (1972) is incorrect. [details] Type species Nishikawa (1998: 253) stated that the "type species is Lumbricus thalassema by monotypy, because it is the only species with which Thalassema was firstly associated (see ICZN Art 67l)". According to Arts. 67.1.2 and 67.12 of the Code (ICZN 1999), however, the type species must be Thalassema neptuni, not Lumbricus thalassema. [details]