original description
Saint-Joseph, Arthur d'Anthoine de. (1899). Note sur une nouvelle famille d'Annélides Polychètes. <em>Bulletin du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.</em> 5: 41-42., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5029420
page(s): 41, without figures; note: preliminary description of Pilargis and Pilargidae [details]
original description
(of Talehsapiidae Misra, 1999) Misra, A. (1999). Polychaete [Fauna of West Bengal]. <em>[book chapter].</em> pp. 125-225. In: Gosh, A.K. (ed.). Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, Series 3. State Fauna Series, Fauna of West Bengal, part 10, Invertebrates., available online at http://faunaofindia.nic.in/php/sfs_books_list.php
page(s): 144 [details] Available for editors [request]
taxonomy source
Glasby, Christopher J.; Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2022). Pilargidae Saint-Joseph, 1899. <em>[book series].</em> 7.13.3.4, pages 308-323, in "Handbook of Zoology. Annelida volume 4. Pleistoannelida, Errantia II" Purschke, G., Westheide, W., Böggemann, M., Eds, De Gruyter., available online at https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110647167-011 [details]
redescription
Saint-Joseph, Arthur d'Anthoine de. (1899). Annélides polychètes de la rade de Brest et de Paimpol. <em>Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie et Paléontologie, Série 8.</em> 10: 161-194, plate VI., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36044621
page(s): 175; note: Saint-Joseph full description and figures of Pilargidae & Pilargis following the preliminary short description [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Authority Saint-Joseph (1899) is accepted as the authority and date for family Pilargidae, although Saint-Joseph used the informal French 'Famille des Pilargidiens' in headings in both the articles where he introduced the new genus Pilargis and placed it in a new family. He used a similar style for all his usages of family names. Saint-Joseph clearly intended to create a new family, and correctly based it on his new genus Pilargis. The relevant article in the Code is 11.7.2 which permits an original non-latinized family name that was published before 1900 to have the original author name & date, rather than that of the author who later latinized it, if it was indeed latinized by later workers and generally accepted as valid [details]
Etymology Not stated. Unclear. Not a known word in Latin or Greek, and no other biologist has used it. See speculation in the etymological comments for genus Pilargis from which it was derived. [details]