WoRMS taxon details
Naididae Ehrenberg, 1831
Branchinaididae Czerniavsky, 1881 · unaccepted
Chaetogastridae Levinsen, 1884 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Tubificidae d'Udekem, 1855 · unaccepted (ICZN 2007; opinion 2167 (Case 3305) -...)
ICZN 2007; opinion 2167 (Case 3305) - all former tubificids should now be regarded as members of the Naididae
- Subfamily Limnodriloidinae Erséus, 1982
- Genus Doliodrilus Erséus, 1984
- Genus Limnodriloides Pierantoni, 1903
- Genus Parakaketio Erséus, 1982
- Genus Rossidrilus Erséus & Rota, 1996
- Genus Smithsonidrilus Brinkhurst, 1966
- Genus Tectidrilus Erséus, 1982
- Genus Thalassodrilides Brinkhurst & Baker, 1979
- Genus Bohadschia Hrabe, 1971 accepted as Limnodriloides Pierantoni, 1903
- Genus Kaketio Righi & Kanner, 1979 accepted as Thalassodrilides Brinkhurst & Baker, 1979
- Genus Limnodriloideds Pierantoni, 1904 accepted as Limnodriloides Pierantoni, 1903 (Lapsus calami)
- Genus Marcusaedrilus Righi & Kanner, 1979 accepted as Smithsonidrilus Brinkhurst, 1966 (synonym)
- Subfamily Naidinae Ehrenberg, 1831
- Genus Amphichaeta Tauber, 1879
- Genus Nais Müller, 1774
- Genus Paranais Czerniavsky, 1881
- Genus Bohemilla Vejdovský, 1884 accepted as Vejdovskyella Michaelsen, 1903 (Synonym)
- Genus Blanonais Gervais, 1838 (uncertain > nomen dubium, unused, possibly nomen oblitum, but would be senior to Paranais Czerniavsky, 1881 if they are synonyms)
- Subfamily Phallodrilinae Brinkhurst, 1971
- Genus Aberrantidrilus Martin, 2015
- Genus Abyssidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Adelodrilus Cook, 1969
- Genus Aktedrilus Knöllner, 1935
- Genus Albanidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Atlantidrilus Erséus, 1982
- Genus Bathydrilus Cook, 1970
- Genus Bermudrilus Erséus, 1979
- Genus Coralliodrilus Erséus, 1979
- Genus Duridrilus Erséus, 1983
- Genus Gianius Erséus, 1992
- Genus Inanidrilus Erséus, 1979
- Genus Inermidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Jamiesoniella Erséus, 1981
- Genus Marionidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Mexidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Milliganius Erséus, 1992
- Genus Mitinokuidrilus Takashima & Mawatari, 1998
- Genus Nootkadrilus Baker, 1982
- Genus Olavius Erséus, 1984
- Genus Pacifidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Paraktedrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Pectinodrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Peosidriloides Erséus & Milligan, 1994
- Genus Peosidrilus Baker & Erséus, 1979
- Genus Phallodriloides Erséus, 1992
- Genus Phallodrilus Pierantoni, 1902
- Genus Pirodriloides Erséus, 1992
- Genus Pirodrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Pseudospiridion Erséus, 1992
- Genus Somalidrilus Erséus, 1992
- Genus Spiridion Knöllner, 1935
- Genus Thalassodrilus Brinkhurst, 1963
- Genus Uniporodrilus Erséus, 1979
- Genus Adelodriloides Cook, 1970 accepted as Adelodrilus Cook, 1969 (synonym)
- Genus Bacescuella Hrabe, 1973 accepted as Aktedrilus Knöllner, 1935 (Synonym)
- Genus Macroseta Erséus, 1975 accepted as Bathydrilus Cook, 1970 (Synonym)
- Subfamily Rhyacodrilinae Hrabě, 1963
- Genus Ainudrilus Finogenova, 1982
- Genus Heronidrilus Erséus & Jamieson, 1981
- Genus Heterodrilus Pierantoni, 1902
- Genus Jolydrilus Er. Marcus, 1965
- Genus Macquaridrilus Jamieson, 1968
- Genus Monopylephorus Levinsen, 1884
- Genus Paupidrilus Erséus, 1990
- Genus Rhizodrilus Smith, 1900
- Genus Torodrilus Cook, 1970
- Genus Giereidrilus Erséus, 1981 accepted as Heterodrilus Pierantoni, 1902 (synonym)
- Genus Macquaridriloides Erséus & Jamieson, 1981 accepted as Heronidrilus Erséus & Jamieson, 1981 (synonym)
- Genus Vermiculus Goodrich, 1892 accepted as Monopylephorus Levinsen, 1884 (synonym)
- Subfamily Tubificinae Claus, 1876
- Genus Baltidrilus Timm, 2013
- Genus Christerius Holmquist, 1985
- Genus Clitellio Savigny, 1822
- Genus Ilyodrilus Eisen, 1879
- Genus Isochaetides Hrabĕ, 1966
- Genus Limnodrilus Claparède, 1862
- Genus Potamothrix Vejdovský & Mrázek, 1903
- Genus Tasserkidrilus Holmquist, 1985
- Genus Telliclio Timm, 1978
- Genus Tubifex Lamarck, 1816
- Genus Tubificoides Lastočkin, 1937
- Genus Clitelloides Finogenova, 1985 accepted as Clitellio (Clitelloides) Finogenova, 1985
- Genus Edukemius Holmquist, 1978 accepted as Tubificoides Lastočkin, 1937 (synonym)
- Genus Heterochaeta Claparède, 1863 accepted as Baltidrilus Timm, 2013 (junior homonym of Heterochaeta Westwood, 1843 (Insecta, Mantodea).)
- Genus Peloryctes Leuckart, 1849 accepted as Clitellio Savigny, 1822 (Synonym)
- Genus Psammoryctes Vejdovský, 1876 accepted as Psammoryctides Hrabe, 1964 (Synonym)
- Genus Hemitubifex Eisen, 1879 (uncertain > taxon inquirendum)
- Genus Peloscolex Leidy, 1852 (uncertain > nomen dubium)
- Subfamily Paranaidinae Sperber, 1948 accepted as Naidinae Ehrenberg, 1831
- Genus Aegialina Friend, 1916 (uncertain > taxon inquirendum)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Ehrenberg, C. G. (1828-1831). Animalia evertebrata exclusis Insectis. Series prima. In: F. G. Hemprich & C. G. Ehrenberg, <i>Symbolae physicae, seu icones et descriptiones Mammalium, Avium, Insectorum et animalia evertebra, quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalem studio nova aut illustrata redierunt</i>. 126 pp. (1831), 10 pls (1828)., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/48517135 [details]
Nomenclature Morphological and molecular characters support that the former clitellate family Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 is nested within...
Nomenclature Morphological and molecular characters support that the former clitellate family Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 is nested within another family, Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876. To avoid paraphyly of the latter, it has been suggested that the two should be regarded as a single taxon. A recent decision by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature [2007; opinion 2167 (Case 3305)] ruled against a proposed reversal of the nomenclatural priority of Naididae over Tubificidae, with the consequence that all former tubificids should now be regarded as members of the Naididae whenever these two names are regarded as synonyms. The paper is a plea to clitellate researchers to conform to this ruling. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Naididae Ehrenberg, 1831. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=2039 on 2024-11-21
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
db_admin
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Ehrenberg, C. G. (1828-1831). Animalia evertebrata exclusis Insectis. Series prima. In: F. G. Hemprich & C. G. Ehrenberg, <i>Symbolae physicae, seu icones et descriptiones Mammalium, Avium, Insectorum et animalia evertebra, quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalem studio nova aut illustrata redierunt</i>. 126 pp. (1831), 10 pls (1828)., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/48517135 [details]
original description (of Tubificidae d'Udekem, 1855) Udekem, J. d'. (1855). Nouvelles classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Bulletins de l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique.</em> 22(2): 533-557, 3 figs., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15749769
page(s): 539, 541; note: as Famille des Tubifex [details]
original description (of Branchinaididae Czerniavsky, 1881) Czerniavsky, Voldemaro. (1881 (for year 1880)). Materialia Ad Zoographiam Ponticam Comparatam. Fasciculum III. Vermes [first part of 3]. <em>Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou (= Byulletin' Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody).</em> 55(4): 213-363 + 2 Plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34420731
page(s): 312 [details]
original description (of Chaetogastridae Levinsen, 1884) Levinsen, G.M.R. (1884 (for year 1883)). Systematisk-geografisk Oversigt over de nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chaetognathi og Balanoglossi. <em>Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den naturhistoriske Forening i Kjöbenhavn.</em> 45(1883): 95-354 + plates II-III., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16065206
page(s): 213, 215 [details]
taxonomy source Envall, I.; Källersjö, M.; Erséus, C. (2006). Molecular evidence for the non-monophyletic status of Naidinae (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae). <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.</em> 40(2): 570-584., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.021 [details] Available for editors
[request]
taxonomy source Van Haaren, T.; Martin, P.; Dubois, A. (2021). Authorship and date of five family-series nomina in Oligochaeta (Annelida): Lumbricidae, Naididae, Enchytraeidae, Tubificidae and Lumbriculidae. <em>Bionomina.</em> 21(1): 140-145., available online at https://www.mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.21.1.10 [details] Available for editors [request]
taxonomy source ICZN. (2007). Opinion 2167 (Case 3305). Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 (Annelida, Clitellata): precedence over Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876 maintained. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 64(1): 71-72., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34356073 [details] Available for editors [request]
taxonomy source Erséus, C.; Gustavsson, L. (2002). A proposal to regard the former family Naididae as a subfamily within Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). <em>Hydrobiologia.</em> 485: 253–256. [details] Available for editors [request]
taxonomy source Erséus, C.; Gustavsson, L.; Brinkhurst, R.O. (2005). Case 3305: TUBIFICIDAE Vejdovský, 1876 (Annelida, Clitellata): proposed precedence over NAIDIDAE Ehrenberg, 1828. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 62(4): 226-231., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34357682 [details] Available for editors [request]
context source (MSBIAS) MEDIN. (2011). UK checklist of marine species derived from the applications Marine Recorder and UNICORN. version 1.0. [details]
additional source Dehorne, L. (1916). Les Naidomorphes et leur reproduction asexuee. <em>Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> 56(2):25-157 + Plates I-III., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6322239 [details]
additional source Claus, C. (1876). Grundzüge der Zoologie. (Third edition) [Principles of Zoology]. <em>N.G. Elwertsche Verlagsuchhandlung, Marburg & Leipzig.</em> 1-1254. (vol.1. incl. Annelides p.394-421, Copepoda p.465-480, vol.2 Mollusca),., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/11954#/summary
page(s): 420; note: as family Naideae [details]
additional source Udekem, J. d'. (1859). Nouvelle classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique.</em> 31: 1-28., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16207584
page(s): 17; note: as Famille des Naïcidées [details]
additional source Czerniavsky, Voldemaro. (1881 (for year 1880)). Materialia Ad Zoographiam Ponticam Comparatam. Fasciculum III. Vermes [first part of 3]. <em>Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou (= Byulletin' Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody).</em> 55(4): 213-363 + 2 Plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34420731
page(s): 303 [details]
additional source Udekem, J. d'. (1855). Nouvelles classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Bulletins de l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique.</em> 22(2): 533-557, 3 figs., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15749769
page(s): 548; note: as Famille des Naides [details]
status source Erseus, C.; Wetzel, M. J.; Gustavsson, L. (2008). ICZN rules—a farewell to Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 1744(1): 66., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1744.1.7 [details] Available for editors [request]
identification resource Brinkhurst, R.O. (1965). Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta II: Tubificidae. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 117 (4):117-172. [details] Available for editors [request]
identification resource Brinkhurst, R.O. (1964). Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta. I. Naididae and Opistocytidae. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 116:195-230. [details] Available for editors [request]
original description (of Tubificidae d'Udekem, 1855) Udekem, J. d'. (1855). Nouvelles classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Bulletins de l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique.</em> 22(2): 533-557, 3 figs., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15749769
page(s): 539, 541; note: as Famille des Tubifex [details]
original description (of Branchinaididae Czerniavsky, 1881) Czerniavsky, Voldemaro. (1881 (for year 1880)). Materialia Ad Zoographiam Ponticam Comparatam. Fasciculum III. Vermes [first part of 3]. <em>Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou (= Byulletin' Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody).</em> 55(4): 213-363 + 2 Plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34420731
page(s): 312 [details]
original description (of Chaetogastridae Levinsen, 1884) Levinsen, G.M.R. (1884 (for year 1883)). Systematisk-geografisk Oversigt over de nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chaetognathi og Balanoglossi. <em>Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den naturhistoriske Forening i Kjöbenhavn.</em> 45(1883): 95-354 + plates II-III., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16065206
page(s): 213, 215 [details]
taxonomy source Envall, I.; Källersjö, M.; Erséus, C. (2006). Molecular evidence for the non-monophyletic status of Naidinae (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae). <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.</em> 40(2): 570-584., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.021 [details] Available for editors
[request]taxonomy source Van Haaren, T.; Martin, P.; Dubois, A. (2021). Authorship and date of five family-series nomina in Oligochaeta (Annelida): Lumbricidae, Naididae, Enchytraeidae, Tubificidae and Lumbriculidae. <em>Bionomina.</em> 21(1): 140-145., available online at https://www.mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.21.1.10 [details] Available for editors
[request]taxonomy source ICZN. (2007). Opinion 2167 (Case 3305). Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 (Annelida, Clitellata): precedence over Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876 maintained. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 64(1): 71-72., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34356073 [details] Available for editors
[request]taxonomy source Erséus, C.; Gustavsson, L. (2002). A proposal to regard the former family Naididae as a subfamily within Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). <em>Hydrobiologia.</em> 485: 253–256. [details] Available for editors
[request]taxonomy source Erséus, C.; Gustavsson, L.; Brinkhurst, R.O. (2005). Case 3305: TUBIFICIDAE Vejdovský, 1876 (Annelida, Clitellata): proposed precedence over NAIDIDAE Ehrenberg, 1828. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 62(4): 226-231., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34357682 [details] Available for editors
[request]context source (MSBIAS) MEDIN. (2011). UK checklist of marine species derived from the applications Marine Recorder and UNICORN. version 1.0. [details]
additional source Dehorne, L. (1916). Les Naidomorphes et leur reproduction asexuee. <em>Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> 56(2):25-157 + Plates I-III., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6322239 [details]
additional source Claus, C. (1876). Grundzüge der Zoologie. (Third edition) [Principles of Zoology]. <em>N.G. Elwertsche Verlagsuchhandlung, Marburg & Leipzig.</em> 1-1254. (vol.1. incl. Annelides p.394-421, Copepoda p.465-480, vol.2 Mollusca),., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/11954#/summary
page(s): 420; note: as family Naideae [details]
additional source Udekem, J. d'. (1859). Nouvelle classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique.</em> 31: 1-28., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16207584
page(s): 17; note: as Famille des Naïcidées [details]
additional source Czerniavsky, Voldemaro. (1881 (for year 1880)). Materialia Ad Zoographiam Ponticam Comparatam. Fasciculum III. Vermes [first part of 3]. <em>Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou (= Byulletin' Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody).</em> 55(4): 213-363 + 2 Plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34420731
page(s): 303 [details]
additional source Udekem, J. d'. (1855). Nouvelles classification des Annélides sétigères abranches. <em>Bulletins de l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique.</em> 22(2): 533-557, 3 figs., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15749769
page(s): 548; note: as Famille des Naides [details]
status source Erseus, C.; Wetzel, M. J.; Gustavsson, L. (2008). ICZN rules—a farewell to Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 1744(1): 66., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1744.1.7 [details] Available for editors
[request]identification resource Brinkhurst, R.O. (1965). Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta II: Tubificidae. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 117 (4):117-172. [details] Available for editors
[request]identification resource Brinkhurst, R.O. (1964). Studies on the North American aquatic Oligochaeta. I. Naididae and Opistocytidae. <em>Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.</em> 116:195-230. [details] Available for editors
[request]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Morphological and molecular characters support that the former clitellate family Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 is nested within another family, Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876. To avoid paraphyly of the latter, it has been suggested that the two should be regarded as a single taxon. A recent decision by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature [2007; opinion 2167 (Case 3305)] ruled against a proposed reversal of the nomenclatural priority of Naididae over Tubificidae, with the consequence that all former tubificids should now be regarded as members of the Naididae whenever these two names are regarded as synonyms. The paper is a plea to clitellate researchers to conform to this ruling. [details]
