Reinhard, W. (1885). Kinorhyncha (Echinoderes), leur structure anatomique et leur place dans le système. <em>Travaux de la Société des Naturalistes à l'Université Impériale de Kharkow.</em> 19: 205-305, pls. VIII-XII. [in Russian].[details]
Neuhaus, B. (2023). World Kinorhyncha Database. Kinorhyncha. Accessed through: RAS (Eds.) (2023) Register of Antarctic Species at: https://ras.biodiversity.aq/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=101060 on 2023-12-02
RAS (Eds.) (2023). Register of Antarctic Species. Kinorhyncha. Accessed at: https://ras.biodiversity.aq/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=101060 on 2023-12-02
original descriptionReinhard, W. (1885). Kinorhyncha (Echinoderes), leur structure anatomique et leur place dans le système. <em>Travaux de la Société des Naturalistes à l'Université Impériale de Kharkow.</em> 19: 205-305, pls. VIII-XII. [in Russian].[details]
taxonomy sourceReinhard, W. (1887). Kinorhyncha (Echinoderes), ihr anatomischer Bau und ihre Stellung im System. <em>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie.</em> 45: 401-467, pls. XX-XXII. note: Reinhard (1887) represented the German translation of the Russian article of Reinhard (1885). Unfortunately, Reinhard (1887) made only in the title a single, a bit cryptic reference to his earlies stu...
Reinhard (1887) represented the German translation of the Russian article of Reinhard (1885). Unfortunately, Reinhard (1887) made only in the title a single, a bit cryptic reference to his earlies study from 1885 in Russian, which is the taxonomically relevant article. Therefore, Reinhard (1885) seemed to have escaped the attention of the scientific community for a long time (see also Neuhaus 2013, p. 273).
taxonomy sourceMalakhov, V. V. (1980). Cephalorhyncha, a new animal phylum uniting Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Gordiacea, and a system of Aschelminthes worms [in Russian]. <em>Zoologichesky Zhurnal.</em> 59(4): 485-499.[details] Available for editors
taxonomy sourceAdrianov, A. V.; Malakhov, V. V. (1999). Cephalorhyncha of the world ocean. <em>KMK Scientific Press, Moscow.</em> 328 pp. [in Russian and English]. note: The book reviews the research history, anatomy, postembryonic development, biogeography, phylogeny, and systematics at species level of Priapulida, Loricifera, Nematomorpha, and Kinorhyncha in Russian...
The book reviews the research history, anatomy, postembryonic development, biogeography, phylogeny, and systematics at species level of Priapulida, Loricifera, Nematomorpha, and Kinorhyncha in Russian and the latter taxon also in English. Identification keys at species level are provided. All species are briefly treated and illustrated, 13 new species are described.
taxonomy sourceSørensen, M. V.; Dal Zotto, M.; Rho, H. S.; Herranz, M.; Sánchez, N.; Pardos, F.; Yamasaki, H. (2015). Phylogeny of Kinorhyncha based on morphology and two molecular loci. <em>PLOS ONE.</em> 10(7): e0133440, 33 pp., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133440[details]
taxonomy sourceSørensen, M. V. (2013). Phylum Kinorhyncha. <em>In</em>: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal Biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (Addenda 2013). Zootaxa 3703, 1-82. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3703(1): 63-66., available online athttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.13 note: Outline of classification of Kinorhyncha with orders, families, and genera as well as species numbers of each genus. [details]
taxonomy sourceTelford, M. J.; Bourlat, S. J.; Economou, A.; Papillon, D.; Rota-Stabelli, O. (2008). The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.</em> 363: 1529-1537., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2243 note: Abstract (shortened): Ecdysozoa is a clade composed of arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, nematodes, nematomorphs, priapulids, kinorhynchs and loriciferans. The monophyly of the clade has been ca...
Abstract (shortened): Ecdysozoa is a clade composed of arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, nematodes, nematomorphs, priapulids, kinorhynchs and loriciferans. The monophyly of the clade has been called into question by some workers based on analyses of whole genome datasets. We review the evidence that now conclusively supports the unique origin of these phyla. Relationships within Ecdysozoa are also controversial and we discuss the molecular and morphological evidence for a number of monophyletic groups within this superphylum.
taxonomy sourceChitwood, B G. (1959). The classification of the phylum Kinorhyncha (Reinhard, 1887) Pearse, 1936. <em>Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Zoology, London, 16-23 July 1958, Hewer, H. R., & Riley, N. D. (eds), XVth International Congress of Zoology at the Rooms of the Linnean Society of London.</em> 941-943. note: The article provides a classification of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
taxonomy sourceGiribet, G.; Edgecombe, G. D. (2017). Current understanding of Ecdysozoa and its internal phylogenetic relationships. <em>Integrative and Comparative Biology.</em> 57(3): 455-466., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx072[details]
taxonomy sourceLaumer, C. E.; Fernández, R.; Lemer, S.; Combosch, D.; Kocot, K. M.; Riesgo, A.; Andrade, S. C. S.; Sterrer, W.; Sørensen, M. V.; Giribet, G. (2019). Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla. <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.</em> 286, 20190831: 1-10., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0831 note: We here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla. Results from the site-heterogeneous CAT þ GTR model rec...
We here present the first attempt to investigate (though not conclusively resolve) animal relationships using genome-scale data from all phyla. Results from the site-heterogeneous CAT þ GTR model recapitulate many established major clades, and strongly confirm some recent discoveries, such as a monophyletic Lophophorata, and a sister group relationship between Gnathifera and Chaetognatha, raising continued questions on the nature of the spiralian ancestor. We also explore matrix construction with an eye towards testing specific relationships; this approach uniquely recovers support for Panarthropoda, and shows that Lophotrochozoa (a subclade of Spiralia) can be constructed in strongly conflicting ways using different taxon- and/or orthologue sets. Dayhoff-6 recoding sacrifices information, but can also reveal surprising outcomes, e.g. full support for a clade of Lophophorata and Entoprocta þ Cycliophora, a clade of Placozoa þ Cnidaria, and raising support for Ctenophora as sister group to the remaining Metazoa, in a manner dependent on the gene and/or taxon sampling of the matrix in question. Future work should test the hypothesis that the few remaining uncertainties in animal phylogeny might reflect violations of the various stationarity assumptions used in contemporary inference methods.
taxonomy sourceJeeva, C.; Mohan, P. M.; Ragavan, P.; Muruganantham, V. (2020). A review on taxonomy of phylum Kinorhyncha. <em>Open Journal of Marine Science.</em> 10(4): 260-294., available online athttps://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2020.104020 note: Editor's comment: The authors considered species indeterminata, taxa inquirenda, nomina dubia, and species described from juvenile stages as invalid species, which does not agree with the ICZN. [details]
taxonomy sourceHerranz, M.; Stiller, J.; Worsaae, K.; Sørensen, M. V. (2022). Phylogenomic analyses of mud dragons (Kinorhyncha). <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.</em> 168, 107375: 1-10., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107375[details] Available for editors
basis of recordNeuhaus, B.; van der Land, J. (2001). Cephalorhyncha (=Loricifera, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Nematomorpha), <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 159-160 (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional sourceGreeff, R. (1869). Untersuchungen über einige merkwürdige Thiergruppen des Arthropoden- und Wurm-Typus. <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 35(1): 71-121., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7058414 note: article covers history, morphology, ecology and phylogeny of Kinorhyncha [details]
additional sourceZelinka, C. (1908). Zur Anatomie der Echinoderen. <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger.</em> 33 (19/20): 629-647. note: The article reports about kinorhynch morphology with an intensive discussion of Schepotieff (1908). The author also introduces inadvertently Centropsis parallela, Pycnophyes communis, P. flaveolata, a...
The article reports about kinorhynch morphology with an intensive discussion of Schepotieff (1908). The author also introduces inadvertently Centropsis parallela, Pycnophyes communis, P. flaveolata, and Trachyemus giganteus as new species.
additional sourceZelinka, K. (1928). Monographie der Echinodera. <em>Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.</em> 1-396, plates I-XXVII. note: The book covers almost all aspects of Kinorhyncha, including morphology, reproduction, postembryonic development, phylogeny, parasites, ecology, distribution, and taxonomy. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceNeuhaus, B. (2013). 5. Kinorhyncha (= Echinodera). In: Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Zoology, Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera, Volume 1: Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin,. pp. 181-348. (look up in IMIS), available online athttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272536.181 note: The book chapter reviews all known aspects of Kinorhyncha like research history, taxonomy, phylogeny, morphology, anatomy, reproduction, locomotion, ecology, development, biogeography, epifauna, and p...
The book chapter reviews all known aspects of Kinorhyncha like research history, taxonomy, phylogeny, morphology, anatomy, reproduction, locomotion, ecology, development, biogeography, epifauna, and parasites. A key at genus level is also provided.
additional sourceSchepotieff, A. (1907). Die Echinoderiden. <em>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie.</em> 88(2): 291-326, pls. XVII-XX. note: The article provides information about history of research and new information about the anatomy, morphology and distribution of several species of Echinoderes. [details]
additional sourceZelinka, C. (1907). Zur Kenntnis der Echinoderen. <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger.</em> 32(5): 130-136. note: The article reports about kinorhynch morphology with an intensive discussion of Schepotieff (1907). [details]
additional sourceHiggins, R.P. & H. Thiel. (1988). Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna. <em>Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.</em> 488 pp. note: The book chapter reviews briefly the classification, habitats, collection and further processing of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceAdrianov, A. V. and Malakhov, V. V. (1995). The phylogeny and classification of the phylum Cephalorhyncha. <em>Zoosystematics Rossica.</em> 3(2): 181-201. note: The article argues about a phylogenetic system of Cephalorhyncha comprising fossila and recent taxa of Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera, and Nematomorpha. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceBütschli, O. (1876). Untersuchungen über freilebende Nematoden und die Gattung Chaetonotus. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 26: 363-413., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/itempdf/135000 note: The article discussed the phylogenetic relationsships of Kinorhyncha to other worm groups. [details]
additional sourceReinhard, W. (1883). Zum Bau der Echinoderes. <em>Protokoll der VII. Versammlung russischer Naturforscher und Ärzte. Sitzung der zoologischen Sektion den 22. August 1883, Odessa.</em> Vol. 2A (3): 1-11 [in Russian].[details]
additional sourceYamasaki, H.; Hiruta, S. F.; Kajihara, H. (2013). Molecular phylogeny of kinorhynchs. <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.</em> 67(2): 303-310., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.016 note: The article represented the first analysis of the phylogenetic relationsships within Kinorhyncha based on molecular data. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceSchepotieff, A. (1908). 3. Zur Kenntnis der Echinoderiden. <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger.</em> 32: 585-589. note: The article reports about kinorhynch morphology with an intensive discussion of Zelinka (1907). [details]
additional sourceRemane, A. (1929). Dritte Klasse des Cladus Nemathelminthes. Kinorhyncha = Echinodera. <em>De Gruyter, Berlin, Handbuch der Zoologie.</em> Band 2, Lieferung 6, 187-248. note: The book chapter covers almost all aspects of Kinorhyncha, including morphology, reproduction, postembryonic development, phylogeny, parasites, ecology, distribution, and taxonomy. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceKristensen, R. M. (2002). Kinorhyncha. <em>Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wley & Sons, Ltd.</em> 1-3., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0001590 note: Short review of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceNeuhaus, B. (2022). How repeatable are scientific studies of Kinorhyncha? An analysis of specimen-based location and deposition data in WoRMS from 1863 to 2020. <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger.</em> 301: 163-173. (look up in IMIS), available online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.08.006[details] Available for editors
additional sourceAdrianov, A. V.; Malakhov, V. V. (1994). Kinorhyncha: Structure, development, phylogeny and taxonomy. <em>Nauka Publishing, Moscow.</em> 1–262. [in Russian]. note: The book describes light microscopy, TEM, SEM, postembryonic development, phylogeny and taxonomy of Kinorhyncha and provides identification keys at species llevel of species-rich taxa. [details] Available for editors
additional sourcede Beauchamp, P. (1965). Classe des kinorhynques. Echinodères (Dujardin 1851)—Kinorhyncha (Reinhard 1887). <em>In: Grassé, P.-P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, systématique, biologie. Masson et Cie Éditeurs Libraires de l'Académie de Médecine, Paris.</em> Vol. IV Némathelminthes (nématodes, gordiacés, rotifères, gastrotriches, kinorhynques), fascicule 3: 1407–1419. note: The book chapter covers almost all aspects of Kinorhyncha, including morphology, reproduction, postembryonic development, phylogeny, distribution, and taxonomy. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceAdrianov, A. V.; Malakhov, V. V. (1996). The phylogeny and classification of the class Kinorhyncha. <em>Zoosystematics Rossica.</em> 4 (1): 23-44. note: The article provides a phylogenetic analysis and a classification of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceRemane, A. (1936). Aschelminthes. Kinorhyncha (= Echinodera). In: Remane, A., Gastrotricha und Kinorhyncha, Dr. H. G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig. 4. Band: Vermes, II. Abteilung: Aschelminthes, Trochelminthes, 1. Buch, 2.Teil: Gastrotricha und Kinorhyncha, pp.243-372, Appendix pp. 373–385. note: The book chapter covers almost all aspects of Kinorhyncha, including morphology, reproduction, postembryonic development, phylogeny, parasites, ecology, distribution, and taxonomy. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceNeedham, A. E. (1989). 10. Kinorhyncha. In: Adiyodi, K.G. & Adiyodi, R.G. (eds). <em>Reproductive biology of invertebrates.</em> Vol IV, Part A: Fertilization, development, and parental care. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 207–217. note: The book chapter reviews aspects of the reproductive biology of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
additional sourceAdrianov, A. V.; Malakhov, V. V. (1995). Synopsis of the system of the phylum Cephalorhyncha. <em>Russian Journal of Marine Biology.</em> 21 (2): 89-96. note: The article suggests a classification of Cephalorhyncha comprising fossila and recent taxa of Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera, and Nematomorpha. [details] Available for editors
status sourceRuggiero, M.A., D.P. Gordon, T.M. Orrell, N. Bailly, T. Bourgoin, R.C. Brusca, T. Cavalier-Smith, M.D. Guiry & P.M. Kirk. (2015). A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms. <em>PLOS ONE.</em> 10(4):1-60. (look up in IMIS), available online athttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248[details]
ecology sourceCepeda, D.; Pardos, F.; Sánchez, N. (2021). From biggest to smallest mud dragons: size-latitude trends in a group of meiobenthic animals worldwide. <em>Organisms Diversity & Evolution.</em> 21(1): 43-58., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-020-00471-y[details] Available for editors
identification resourceBoykin, J. C. (1974). Phylum Kinorhyncha. In: E.N. Kozloff (ed.), Keys to the marine invertebrates of Puget Sound and the San Juan Archipelago, and adjacent regions. VII + 266 pp. University of Washington Press, Seattle. pp. 39-41.[details] Available for editors
identification resourceAdrianov, A. V.; Maiorova, A. (2020). Chapter 13 Kinorhyncha. A review on biogeography of the deep-sea Kinorhyncha (phylum Cephalorhyncha Malakhov, 1980) along the NW Pacific. In: Saeedi, H. & Brandt, A. (eds), Biogeographic atlas of the deep NW Pacific fauna. 251-266., available online athttps://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e51315 note: The authors summarize information about deep-sea Kinorhyncha from the Kuril-Kamchatka trench and comment about their diagnoses and biogeography. [details]
identification resourceSørensen, M. V.; Pardos, F. (2008). Kinorhynch systematics and biology – an introduction to the study of kinorhynchs, inclusive identification keys to the genera. <em>Meiofauna Marina.</em> 16: 21-73. note: The authors describe and illustrate the morphological characters necessary for identification of Kinorhyncha at genus level, habitats, collection, sample processing including mounting for light micros...
The authors describe and illustrate the morphological characters necessary for identification of Kinorhyncha at genus level, habitats, collection, sample processing including mounting for light microscopy, glossary of terms, and provide an illustrated identification key at genus level.
identification resourceBacescu, M. (1968). Class Kinorhyncha. Determination of the fauna of the Black and Azov Seas. 3rd edition. <em>Naukova Dumka.</em> 1, Free-living invertebrates: 237-250 [in Russian]. note: The authors provide a rough key for identification of Kinorhyncha from the Black Sea and Azov Sea. [details] Available for editors
identification resourceDal Zotto, M.; Todaro, M. A. (2016). Kinorhyncha from Italy, a revision of the current checklist and an account of the recent investigations. <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology.</em> 265: 90-107., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2016.01.004[details] Available for editors
identification resourceSørensen, M. V.; Pardos, F. (2020). Kinorhyncha. In: Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.), Guide to the identification of marine meiofauna. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich. 391-414. note: The authors describe and illustrate the morphological characters necessary for identification of Kinorhyncha at genus level, habitats, extraction, and provide an illustrated identification key at genu...
The authors describe and illustrate the morphological characters necessary for identification of Kinorhyncha at genus level, habitats, extraction, and provide an illustrated identification key at genus level.
identification resourceAdrianov, A. V. (2011). Phylum Cephalorhyncha, class Kinorhyncha. In: Buzhinskaja, G.N. (ed.), Illustrated key to the invertebrates of Eurasien Arctic Seas and adjacent deep waters, Vol. 2 Nemertea, Cephalorhyncha, Oligochaeta, Hirudinida, Pogonophora, Echiura, Sipuncula, Phoronida, and Brachiopoda. <em>Alaska Sea Grant, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks.</em> pp. 41-49. note: The author provides an illustrated key for the identification of Eurasien Arctic Kinorhyncha at species level. [details] Available for editors
identification resourceBacescu, M. (1968). Class Kinorhyncha. Determination of the fauna of the Black and Azov Seas. 3rd edition. [2 English translations]. <em>Naukova Dumka.</em> 1, Free-living invertebrates: 237-250. note: The authors provide a rough key for identification of Kinorhyncha from the Black Sea and Azov Sea. [details] Available for editors
identification resourceNeuhaus, B. (2004). 19. Kinorhyncha. In: Hofrichter, R. (ed.), Das Mittelmeer. Fauna, Flora, Ökologie. Vol. II/2 Bestimmungsführer, pp. 646-653. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [details] Available for editors
identification resourceYamasaki, H. (2017). Diversity of Kinorhyncha in Japan and phylogenetic relationships of the phylum. In: Motokawa, M. & Kajihara, H. (eds), Species diversity of animals in Japan, diversity and commonality in animals. Springer Press, Tokyo. pp. 543-563., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56432-4_21 note: The book chapter reviews the extraction of specimens, the research history of Kinorhyncha in Japan, and the phylogeny of the group, provides a species record list and and multi-entry identification gu...
The book chapter reviews the extraction of specimens, the research history of Kinorhyncha in Japan, and the phylogeny of the group, provides a species record list and and multi-entry identification guide to genus level.
identification resourceRemane, A. (1928). VII. d2 Kinorhyncha. In: Grimpe, G. & Wagler, E. (eds), Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Becker & Erler, Leipzig. VIId5: 57-84. note: The book chapter provides general information about the study of Kinorhyncha, their morphology, postembryonic development, distribution, ecology, and phylogenetic relationships, as well as an identifi...
The book chapter provides general information about the study of Kinorhyncha, their morphology, postembryonic development, distribution, ecology, and phylogenetic relationships, as well as an identification key at genus level and sometimes at species level.
biology sourceNeuhaus, B. (2004). 19. Kinorhyncha. In: Hofrichter, R. (ed.), Das Mittelmeer. Fauna, Flora, Ökologie. Vol. II/2 Bestimmungsführer, pp. 646-653. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. note: general treatment of Kinorhyncha and identification guide for Mediterranean species [details] Available for editors
biology sourceNyholm, K.-G.; Nyholm, P.-G. (1983). 11. Kinorhyncha. In: Adiyodi, K.G. & Adiyodi, R.G. (eds), Reproductive biology of invertebrates, Vol. II: Spermatogenesis and sperm function. John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 207-220. note: The book chapter reviews aspects of the reproductive biology of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
biology sourceHiggins, R. P. (1974). Chapter 11 Kinorhyncha. In: Giese, A. C. & Pearse, J. S. (Eds), Reproduction of marine invertebrates, Vol. I. Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate metazoans. Academic Press, New York, pp. 507-518. note: The book chapter reviews the reproduction of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
biology sourceNeuhaus, B.; Higgins, R. P. (2002). Ultrastructure, biology, and phylogenetic relationships of Kinorhyncha. <em>Integrative and Comparative Biology.</em> 42(3): 619-632., available online athttps://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.3.619 note: review of TEM studies, functional morphology and relationships to Priapulida and Loricifera; new findings about localization of chitin in the cuticle at TEM level [details]
biology sourceNeuhaus, B. (1999). Kinorhyncha. In: Knobil, E. & Neill, J. D. (eds), Encyclopedia of reproduction, Vol 2, pp. 933-937. Academic Press, New York. note: review of reproduction in Kinorhyncha [details] Available for editors
biology sourceZelinka, C. (1914). Zwei Ektoparasiten der Echinoderen aus der Klasse der Ciliaten. <em>Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte.</em> 85. Versammlung zu Wien, Teil 2, 1. Hälfte, Nr. 13, 680-683. note: Inadvertantly, the article introduces two protozoan ectoparasites on kinorhynchs, viz, Cothurnia bütschlii and Acineta tuba. These species are actually redescribed in Zelinka (1928). [details]
biology sourceAdrianov, A. V.; Malakhov, V. V. (1999). 7. Kinorhyncha. <em>In: Adiyodi, K.G. & Adiyodi, R.G. (eds.) Reproductive biology of invertebrates, Vol. IX, Part A: Progress in male gamete ultrastructure and phylogeny. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.</em> pp. 193–211. note: The bok chapter reviews the ultrastructure of the male reproductive system of Kinorhyncha. [details] Available for editors
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality